大狮姐让ChatGPT写了一篇TPO54 Task2的作文，托福写作Task 2的时限是30分钟，而ChatGPT花20秒，就交付了一篇350-400字独立写作。
全文如下：（上下滑动阅读）The debate over government spending on arts versus athletics has been ongoing for many years and there are valid arguments on both sides. Those who advocate for increased government spending on the arts argue that it is an investment in culture and that it provides numerous benefits to society, including economic growth and job creation, education and personal development, and the preservation of cultural heritage. On the other hand, those who argue for increased spending on athletics argue that it promotes physical fitness, national pride, and international recognition, and can drive economic growth through tourism and the creation of sports-related jobs.
In my view, both arts and athletics are important and should be supported by governments to some extent. However, the exact amount of funding allocated to each area will depend on a variety of factors, including the priorities and resources of the government, as well as the specific needs and interests of the population.
For example, in countries where there is a strong tradition of artistic expression and cultural heritage, it may be more important to allocate more resources to support the arts. In these countries, investment in the arts can drive tourism, create jobs, and preserve important cultural traditions. In contrast, in countries where athletic performance is a major source of national pride and international recognition, it may be more appropriate to allocate more resources to support athletic programs.
At the same time, its important to consider the economic impact of both arts and athletics. Investment in the arts can stimulate economic growth by creating jobs and boosting tourism. The arts also have the potential to drive innovation and creativity, which can lead to new products and services and provide a boost to the overall economy. On the other hand, investment in athletic programs can also drive economic growth, as sports tourism and the creation of sports-related jobs can contribute to local economies.
Ultimately, the question of whether governments should spend more money on the arts or athletics is a complex one and will depend on a variety of factors. While it is important to support both arts and athletics, the exact allocation of resources will depend on the specific needs and interests of the population, as well as the priorities and resources of the government. In conclusion, while both arts and athletics are important and should be supported by governments, the exact amount of funding allocated to each area will depend on the specific needs and interests of the population and the priorities of the government. Investment in both the arts and athletics can drive economic growth, promote physical fitness and national pride, and contribute to the cultural heritage of a nation.
彭璐老师：我会给4.5分。文章写得非常成熟，对话题进行了非常全面的考虑和论证。开头段的背景中，充分考虑了两方的观点和主要理由。在自己的观点段中，给出了清晰的观点和进一步的建议。在后续的两个段落中，分别从 traditions 和 economy 两个角度分情况讨论/比较了投资 athletics 和 art 的好处。最后两段中，再次强调了决策需要充分权衡。
Do you agree or disagree with the followin statement?
Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.
In my opinion, students are more influenced by their friends rather than their teachers. Therefore, I disagree with the statement “Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.”
I do not disagree with the fact that students get influenced by their teachers, however, I believe that this “influence” is mostly within the field of academics. In most cases, the only time that students communicate with the teacher is in the school building, in the classroom. Most of the discussions are about topics related to studies. However, with friends, students often tend to discuss a variety of topics, such as studies, friends, relationships, and families. Therefore, students are generally influenced more broadly by their friends, while the only influence made by the teachers are mostly academical.
The amount of time spent with the teacher or friend, also effect on how much influence has been made to a person. As mentioned previously, the time that students communicate with the teachers is restricted to school hours. However, students spend or communicate with their friends not only in school but even outside the school campus and school hours. Especially with the emerging technology, and the development of mobile phones and the internet, students are now able to communicate with their friends at any time where ever they are. Since the amount of time spent communicating with their friends are much larger than the time spent with the teachers, there are more chance of the students being influenced by their friends rather than their teachers.
Also, it is normal that the students feel psychologically more attached to the people in their age group, especially with their friends. The teachers are usually from different generations from the students and this may cause the students to feel that there is a distance between how they think/feel and how the teachers think/feel. Since the students are more emotionally and psychologically attached to their friends, they feel more comfortable to discuss their issues with them and accept their responses more openly and easily. This fact relates directly to how much they are influenced by their friends.
For these reasons, I believe that students are more influenced by their friends than by their teachers.
According to the TOEFL writing scoring standard, this composition would likely receive a score of 23-27 out of 30. The following aspects of the writing would be considered in the score:
Task response: The writer clearly states their opinion on the given statement and supports their argument with relevant explanations and examples. The writer also stays focused on the topic throughout the composition.
Organization: The writer effectively presents their ideas in a well-structured manner, with clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The writer also effectively uses transitional words and phrases to connect their ideas.
Coherence and Cohesion: The writer effectively uses cohesive devices such as pronoun references, reference to a previous idea or situation, and repetition of a word or phrase to connect ideas and make the composition easier to follow.
Vocabulary: The writer uses a range of vocabulary to express their ideas clearly and effectively. There are some instances of vocabulary repetitions, but overall the writer uses appropriate and varied vocabulary.
Grammar: The writer demonstrates good control of grammar, although there are some errors that do not significantly hinder the overall meaning of the composition.
This composition demonstrates a good level of writing ability and meets the expectations of a high-intermediate TOEFL test taker.
Please rate the composition according to TOEFL writing scoring standard if the question is “题目”. The english composition is “你的作文”.